gareth kay, modernista!
mark lewis, ddb san francisco
people against lazy
“i’m just surprised that no-one’s thought of a better idea yet.”
stephen king on planning
success?
“in most categories, a brand’s market share is stationary”
4 our of 5 categories seen as inceasingly homogeneous
less than 1 in 10 ads seen as different
4% response rate successful in dm
0.5% average click-through rate for banners
we think we’re changing, but we are what we do
old assumptions>old models of communication>old behavior>misplaced action
deadly sin #1
living by old, unchallenged assumptions
is this it?
awareness>interest>desire>action
isn’t the way things work
we’ve based our thinking on an anomaly in the history of communication: tv
tv: passive, monologue, centralized, image, money, what ‘we’ do
other communication: active, dialogue, decentralized, substance, stickiness, what you do to what we do
deadly sin #2
we care about the wrong objectives
the usual suspects are wrong
awareness: when meaning and familiarity matter more in our world of overchoice
attitude: attitude and attributes, adjusted for size, don't change
image: doesn't shift until after behavior
the real objective
the world is made of energy
the world is electricity
there’s a lot inside of you and there’s a lot inside of me
the world is synchronicity
(the apples)
when something has energy, we can sense it’s movement
it’s not what you got, it’s how you use it
what we should be focusing on is energy
how do we give a brand energy?
ye can ney break the laws of physics jim
low entropy vs high entropy
deadly sin #3
our craving for simplicity and order of outcome
embrace complexity
randomness creates energy
information predictability . . . or information entropy
the more random the source of info is, the higher it’s entropy and the more info it has
more random>more information>more energy
collection of experiences and beliefs with a product or about a product
how does this fit?
brand onions
“consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative”
if we put the chairs out>marketing today
culture craves complexity
“it takes a thousand voices to tell a single story”
native american saying
steven johnson
everything good is bad for you
from dragnet to the sopranos
complexity
great energy
a sense of energy
people crave that now days
wired
snack culture!
twitter richer sense of who that person is
small things adding up to a sum bigger than its parts
the thrill of the new
keep cool with coolidge
the coolidge effect
we as human beings are addicted to the new
best brands do lots of new things all the time
john grand and the molecule
better coffee mission
xm
barista culture
we’re told to keep it simple
that’s not the case anymore
deadly sin #4
what’s the main message?
old model: linear
everything in its right place
a one-way view of information
the reality is everything is intertwingled
imix
reality is more ambiguous
there is no one meaning anymore
why does there have to be a main message on a brief?
seeing what other people do with info
obesity is a social disorder
when our friends gain weight, we gain weight
knowledge versus information
we work hard to find the right message, for the right target at the right time
from thinking to doing
some of the old tablets of information are perhaps wrong
deadly sin #5
self-importance
we think what we do really matters
“people look at what interests them and sometimes it’s your ad”
howard gossage
“often our biggest mistake as managers is believing that, in general, customers care a lot about your brand. they do not”
patrick barwise
it’s about having a social mission, not just a commercial proposition
to get a marketing literate and resistant culture enthusiastic about your brand, then your brand needs to have an enthusiasm
real beauty, not moisturizer
¼ moisturizing cream
heart health/cholesterol, not margarine
encourage messy play
americaneedsdirt.com
messy=fun
good design is a right, not a privilege
ikea
method
people against dirty
not a clearner home, a cleaner world
deadly sin #6
it’s the big things that matter
the world of fat tails
the bell curve
the black swan
the bell curve doesn’t describe a lot of social phenomena
phase transitions
change is never smooth, continuous or instant
it’s a big, big change that happens very fast all of a sudden
we live in complex systems, not unstable ones
why are we overcomplicating the input and oversimplifying the outcomes?
individual actions of small things
we live in an unstable world. we don’t want to believe that small things make a big difference
a chaotic, unpredictable effect between cause and effect
the reason for conspiracy theories
there is 2% difference in the dna between monkey and man
we spend too much time looking at the big things and not enough looking at the small things
a change in x results in all kinds of other changes
we’re all susceptible to small things that make a big difference
deadly sin #7
learn then do
the world is a very unpredictable place
doing then learning then doing again
elf yourself
that was one of 20 viral campaigns
the 1 in 20 rule
only 5% of new products succeed
only 5% of species survive
we still believe we can do one thing and predict the outcome
topshop
disposable fashion
topshop style advisor
recommend the best clothes for you
get away from this mentality that one thing is going to work and go out and try multiple things
seven ways to make brands and their communication matter again
start predicting less
go out there and try things
transmission is not the only way
planning for uncertainty
a linear process>a continuous process of creation
presenting to clients>co-creating with clients
you are never finished
you are always on
energy does not equal noise
it’s not about getting noticed. it’s about demonstrating motion
thank you
and be very
garethkay.com
planning-outside-in.blogspot.com
challenge your boss every day. they’re not always right
there isn’t one way to do planning. there isn’t one way to solve a problem
think of lots of little ideas and bring them to bear
be a sponge for knowledge. learn about that stuff and get involved
if the world is unpredictable, who’s to say it’s going to work twice?
how do you learn in a random world?
the act of research changes the world you are studying
are there some common rules?
some brands have been pretty consistent
google lives in beta
they put stuff out before it’s ready and keep improving it
not enough randomness in what microsoft does. apple much more
coca-cola
the world should be optimistic helped rebuild the brand
energy has to happen to propel a brand forward
strategic consistency
molecule
embrace a bit of chaos in things
zeus jones
not about looking the same. believing the same
the brand isn’t about me. it’s about them
don’t think about 20 executions
think about doing 20 very different things, and one may catch hold in the culture
brands should be trying to focus on a territory. think of it like a field--a field without fences
progressing continually
the strongest brands have lots of breadth of execution
Tuesday, August 7, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment